Account Login
Don't have an account? Create One
“Indigenous nations are stepping forward—not as afterthoughts or stakeholders to consult at the last minute, but as active economic and equity partners.”
Following up on last issue’s column reflecting on how far we’ve come over the past decade in reconciliation, I want to shift from the “how” to the “why.” Specifically, why should we participate in economic reconciliation?
It’s a question that comes up more often than people admit. Around boardroom tables and community meetings alike, the elephant in the room still tends to be some variation of: “What exactly is economic reconciliation—and why does it matter to us?”
January’s column examined the journey from past to present. This issue, I’m looking squarely at the now and what comes next. Economic reconciliation isn’t a buzzword. It is the natural evolution of Indigenous–industry relationships. Indigenous nations are steadily moving beyond both the dependency model and the narrow confines of self-governance frameworks. This shift didn’t happen overnight. It has been a gradual but determined progression—gaining momentum post-1960, accelerating in the 1990s, and now firmly establishing itself in the business conversations and equity deals taking place today.
And here’s the truth: economic reconciliation is good business. It is also a smart, future-focused investment strategy. Across the country, we are seeing equity partnerships, revenue-sharing models and joint ventures that create long-term value not only for Indigenous communities but for the private sector as well. In my 25 years of working in this space, I’ve watched Indigenous nations build robust, own-source revenue streams, form sophisticated corporate arms and position themselves as value-add partners in highly competitive markets.
Sometimes those value-adds take the form of strategies or inclusion frameworks—like RAPs, IPPs, and IBPs—that companies are increasingly expected to understand and implement.
It’s hard to miss the growing alphabet soup of Indigenous inclusion appearing in Requests for Proposals (RFPs), on corporate websites and across procurement conversations. Here’s a simple breakdown of the three most common frameworks:
Continue reading this story: click below to login/subscribe
Login or SubscribeComment policy
Comments are moderated to ensure thoughtful and respectful conversations. First and last names will appear with each submission; anonymous comments and pseudonyms will not be permitted.
By submitting a comment, you accept that Atlantic Business Magazine has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner it chooses. Publication of a comment does not constitute endorsement of that comment. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.